I’ve been following the saga of Peter Galloway and his accusers through the media. Of note was the court ruling mentioned that spreading allegations may not be considered protected speech. Meaning gossips who spread such can be held to account through the courts. And that SLAPP arguments do not stand when the speech may be motivated by malice. I’m assuming such applies to those who regularly engage in racist, ageist or sexist commentary.
Part of the various settlements has been a series of public apologies at Gallowayapologies.com. It, and the Wikipedia article linked are worth a read. Even good intentions can be harmful if the basis of the allegations are false. In my experience many do not attempt to determine the veracity of such claims before spreading them. It may be a costly mistake.
Parts of this resound in my own battles against false allegations, especially this paragraph:
”My understanding of, and approach to, the “believe women” movement was misguided. I should have understood that supporting people who come forward about sexual violence does not require, and cannot justify, acting in ways that may lead others to conclude that unproven allegations are true or failing to give the person accused a fair opportunity to be heard and considered.”
Bingo. Enough of the whispers. If you see somebody engaged in such, call them on it. They are making your world less safe.
disclaimer: Not a lawyer. Just somebody trying to navigate a complex system. Seek professional advice.